GeForce G210M
VS
GeForce GTX 1060

GeForce G210M vs GeForce GTX 1060

NVIDIA

GeForce G210M

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce G210M is positioned at rank #436 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce G210M

#426
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1683%
#428
1526%
#429
1522%
#433
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1384%
#434
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1374%
#436
GeForce G210M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#437
Radeon HD 8450G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#438
Radeon R3
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
97%
#439
97%
#441
Radeon HD 8550G + 8600M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#443
Radeon R9 M360
MSRP: $300|Avg: $81
94%
#444
Radeon HD 8550G + 7600M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
93%
#445
Radeon R9 M365X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
92%
#446
GeForce 7800 GS
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
91%
#447
Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
91%
#448
Radeon R9 M265X
MSRP: $200|Avg: $30
91%
#449
Mobility Radeon HD 5165
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
90%
#450
Radeon R5 M435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
89%
#451
Radeon E8860
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7701.6% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce G210M.

InsightGeForce G210MGeForce GTX 1060
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-7701.6%)
Leading raw performance (+7701.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+1100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1060 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce G210M and GeForce GTX 1060

NVIDIA

GeForce G210M

The GeForce G210M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce G210M scores 129 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 7701.6%. The GeForce G210M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce G210M) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce G210M) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

FeatureGeForce G210MGeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score
129
10,064+7702%
Architecture
Maxwell
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
256
2560+900%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5084 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS+1645%
Boost Clock
993 MHz
1733 MHz+75%
ROPs
8
64+700%
TMUs
24
160+567%
L1 Cache
128 KB
960 KB+650%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce G210MGeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce G210M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce G210M) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce G210MGeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
6 GB+1100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
192 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
192-bit+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce G210M) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce G210MGeForce GTX 1060
DirectX
10.1
12+19%
Vulkan
None
1.3
OpenGL
3.3
4.5+36%
Max Displays
1
4+300%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce G210M) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce G210M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureGeForce G210MGeForce GTX 1060
Encoder
No
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G210M draws 16W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 167.3% difference. The GeForce G210M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G210M) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: Legacy vs 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 173mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce G210MGeForce GTX 1060
TDP
16W-91%
180W
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
Legacy
6-pin
Length
0mm
173mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
8.1
55.9+590%