GeForce G210M vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400

NVIDIA

GeForce G210M

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400

2009Core: 550 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce G210M vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G210M vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G210M

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 16W instead of 30W, a 14W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400

2009

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 87.5% higher power demand at 30W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce G210M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (129 vs 125), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce G210M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce G210M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce G210M vs Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce G210M

The GeForce G210M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.

AMD

Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400

The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 125 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce G210M scores 129 and the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 reaches 125 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G210M is built on Maxwell while the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce G210M) vs 800 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce G210M) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400).

FeatureGeForce G210MSeria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
G3D Mark Score
129+3%
125
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
256
800+213%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5084 TFLOPS
0.88 TFLOPS+73%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
40+67%
L1 Cache
128 KB
160 KB+25%
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G210M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce G210MSeria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G210M and 64-bit on the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce G210M) vs 0.25 MB (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400) — the GeForce G210M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce G210MSeria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce G210M) vs 10_1 (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce G210MSeria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
DirectX
10.1
10_1
Max Displays
1
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce G210M) vs UVD (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD.

FeatureGeForce G210MSeria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Encoder
No
UVD
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
UVD
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G210M draws 16W versus the Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400's 30W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce G210M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G210M) vs 350W (Seria Mobility Radeon HD 3400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce G210MSeria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
TDP
16W-47%
30W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
1mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
8.1+93%
4.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce G210M (2016 vs 2009).

FeatureGeForce G210MSeria Mobility Radeon HD 3400
MSRP
$49
Codename
GM108
M98
Release
March 25 2016
January 9 2009
Ranking
#864
#927

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.