GeForce GTS 250
GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce GTS 250 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTS 250 vs GeForce RTX 4060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTS 250 vs GeForce RTX 4060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTS 250
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅1684.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 1382.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 4.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTS 250 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTS 250
The GeForce GTS 250 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 569 points. Launch price was $129.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTS 250 scores 569 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 3335.5%. The GeForce GTS 250 is built on Fermi while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 250) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 250) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 569 | 19,548+3336% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 3072+1500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+2413% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 32 | 96+200% |
| L1 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 24 MB+9500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTS 250 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTS 250 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 250 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 250 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTS 250) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 8 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 272 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 24 MB+9500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 250) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate+8% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP5 (GeForce GTS 250) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 250) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 250 draws 106W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 8.1% difference. The GeForce GTS 250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTS 250) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W-8% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-18% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 73°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 5.4 | 170.0+3048% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTS 250 came in at $129, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce GTS 250 was 56.9% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.4 (GeForce GTS 250) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 1386.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 250 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-57% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.4 | 65.4+1386% |
| Codename | GF106 | AD107 |
| Release | September 13 2010 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #791 | #84 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTS 250 and GeForce RTX 4060
