
GeForce GTX 485M
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 485M
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅184.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 485M
2011GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅184.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than GeForce GTX 485M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 485M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 485M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 485M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 485M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 485M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 485M and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 485M
GeForce GTX 485M
The GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 1150 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,360 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 485M scores 2,360 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 403.9%. The GeForce GTX 485M is built on Fermi while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 0.8832 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,360 | 11,892+404% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Ampere |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2560+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8832 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+917% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2.5 MB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 485M is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 485M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.6+15% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 485M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 485M draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 26.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 485M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 485M) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-23% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90°C | 75°C-17% |
| Perf/Watt | 23.6 | 91.5+288% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 485M | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Codename | GF104 | GA106 |
| Release | January 5 2011 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #645 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













