GeForce GTX 645
VS
FirePro 3D V7800

GeForce GTX 645 vs FirePro 3D V7800

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 645

2010Core: 607 MHz
VS

FirePro 3D V7800

2014Core: 850 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V7800

#108
Quadro M6000
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500
96%
#109
Quadro M6000 24GB
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600
95%
#255
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
6005%
#270
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
100%
#271
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
100%
#272
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
98%
#273
GRID M6-8Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
97%
#276
GRID K120Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $20
95%
#278
Tesla M60
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250
95%
#279
FirePro V7900
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
92%
#280
GRID P6-4Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
90%
#281
GRID M60-8A
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
90%
#283
Quadro K4000
MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100
87%
#285
GRID P4-2Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $235
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 645 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 3D V7800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 645FirePro 3D V7800
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (254mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 645 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 645 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $40), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 101.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 645FirePro 3D V7800
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+101.4%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 645 and FirePro 3D V7800

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 645

The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

AMD

FirePro 3D V7800

The FirePro 3D V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,867 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 645 scores 1,880 and the FirePro 3D V7800 reaches 1,867 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 645 is built on Fermi while the FirePro 3D V7800 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7800). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7800).

FeatureGeForce GTX 645FirePro 3D V7800
G3D Mark Score
1,880
1,867
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
352
2048+482%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8554 TFLOPS
3.482 TFLOPS+307%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
44
128+191%
L1 Cache
704 KB+38%
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 645FirePro 3D V7800
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 645 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V7800 has 2 GB. The FirePro 3D V7800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 645) vs 768 KB (FirePro 3D V7800) — the FirePro 3D V7800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 645FirePro 3D V7800
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 11.0 (FirePro 3D V7800). Vulkan: 1.2 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 645FirePro 3D V7800
DirectX
11.0
11.0
Vulkan
1.2
None
OpenGL
4.6+12%
4.1
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 645) vs UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V7800). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 645) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V7800).

FeatureGeForce GTX 645FirePro 3D V7800
Encoder
NVENC (1st Gen)
UVD 2.3
Decoder
PureVideo VP5
UVD 2.3
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 645 draws 200W versus the FirePro 3D V7800's 274W — a 31.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 645 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 645) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V7800). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 147mm vs 254mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 645FirePro 3D V7800
TDP
200W-27%
274W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
147mm
254mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
80-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
9.4+38%
6.8
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 645 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the FirePro 3D V7800 launched at $759 and now averages $40. The GeForce GTX 645 costs 50% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 94.0 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 46.7 (FirePro 3D V7800) — the GeForce GTX 645 offers 101.3% better value. The FirePro 3D V7800 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 645FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP
$150-80%
$759
Avg Price (30d)
$20-50%
$40
Performance per Dollar
94.0+101%
46.7
Codename
GF100
Tahiti
Release
May 31 2010
January 18 2014
Ranking
#618
#423