G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 645 vs GeForce RTX 2060 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 645 vs GeForce RTX 2060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 645

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
✅Measures 147mm instead of 229mm, a 82mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 2060

2019

Why buy it

✅324.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 222.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌55.8% longer card at 229mm vs 147mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 324.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 650.7% in PassMark G3D (14,114 vs 1,880), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 2060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 12nm process instead of 40nm, and 30 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 2060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $199 more expensive on MSRP at $349 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 222.7% (40.4 vs 12.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 645 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 645

The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 645 scores 1,880 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 650.7%. The GeForce GTX 645 is built on Fermi while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060).

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	GeForce RTX 2060
G3D Mark Score	1,880	14,114+651%
Architecture	Fermi	Turing
Process Node	40 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	352	1920+445%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8554 TFLOPS	6.451 TFLOPS+654%
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	44	120+173%
L1 Cache	0.69 MB	1.9 MB+175%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	3 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 645 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	GeForce RTX 2060
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 645 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 645 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 645) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	GeForce RTX 2060
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	6 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	336 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	3 MB+500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	GeForce RTX 2060
DirectX	11.0	12 Ultimate (12_2)+9%
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 645) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 645) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	GeForce RTX 2060
Encoder	NVENC (1st Gen)	NVENC (Turing)
Decoder	PureVideo VP5	NVDEC (Turing)
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4	H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 645 draws 200W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 645) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 147mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 72.

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	GeForce RTX 2060
TDP	200W	160W-20%
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	8-pin
Length	147mm	229mm
Height	111mm	113mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	80	72-10%
Perf/Watt	9.4	88.2+838%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 645 came in at $150, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 645 was 57% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 223.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2060 (2019 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 645	GeForce RTX 2060
MSRP	$150-57%	$349
Performance per Dollar	12.5	40.4+223%
Codename	GF100	TU106
Release	May 31 2010	January 7 2019
Ranking	#618	#168

Search GeForce GTX 645 on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 2060 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.