GeForce GTX 645 vs Radeon Vega 11

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 645

2010Core: 607 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Vega 11

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1251 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 645 vs Radeon Vega 11 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 645 vs Radeon Vega 11 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 645 vs Radeon Vega 11: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 645

2010

Why buy it

  • 32.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon Vega 11 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 645 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 471.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 35W.

Radeon Vega 11

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 200W, a 165W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 645 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 645 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 32.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1% in PassMark G3D (1,880 vs 1,861), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 645 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 645 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $150 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1% (12.5 vs 12.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 645 vs Radeon Vega 11 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 645

The GeForce GTX 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points. Launch price was $279.

AMD

Radeon Vega 11

The Radeon Vega 11 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,861 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 645 scores 1,880 and the Radeon Vega 11 reaches 1,861 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 645 is built on Fermi while the Radeon Vega 11 uses GCN 5.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 704 (Radeon Vega 11). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 645) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 11).

FeatureGeForce GTX 645Radeon Vega 11
G3D Mark Score
1,880+1%
1,861
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 5.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
352
704+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8554 TFLOPS
1.761 TFLOPS+106%
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
44
44

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 645 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Vega 11 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 645Radeon Vega 11
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 645 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 11 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 645 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 645 and System on the Radeon Vega 11.

FeatureGeForce GTX 645Radeon Vega 11
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 645 draws 200W versus the Radeon Vega 11's 35W — a 140.4% difference. The Radeon Vega 11 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 645) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 11). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GTX 645Radeon Vega 11
TDP
200W
35W-83%
Recommended PSU
300W
1W-100%
Power Connector
None
Integrated
Length
147mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
9.4
53.2+466%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 645 came in at $150, while the Radeon Vega 11 launched at $150. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (GeForce GTX 645) vs 12.4 (Radeon Vega 11) — the GeForce GTX 645 offers 0.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Vega 11 (2018 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 645Radeon Vega 11
MSRP
$150
$150
Performance per Dollar
12.5
12.4
Codename
GF100
Raven
Release
May 31 2010
May 10 2018
Ranking
#618
#673

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.