G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 690 vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 690 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 690

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
570.5% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅36.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $850 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 853% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅GeForce GTX 690 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 36.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 42.1% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 5,536), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $850 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 853% (52.8 vs 5.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 690 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 690

The GeForce GTX 690 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 3 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 3072 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,536 points. Launch price was $999.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 690 scores 5,536 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 42.1%. The GeForce GTX 690 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 3.13 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1019 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	5,536	7,869+42%
Architecture	Kepler	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	3072 ×2+243%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.13 TFLOPS ×2+5%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1019 MHz	1665 MHz+63%
ROPs	32 ×2	32
TMUs	128 ×2+129%	56
L1 Cache	128 KB	896 KB+600%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 690 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192.2 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 50.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 690. Memory bus width is 256-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX 690 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 690) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	192.2 GB/s x2+50%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit x2+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12_0	12
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 690) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: VP5 vs NVDEC 4th gen.

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	VP5	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 690 draws 300W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce GTX 690) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs None. Card length: 279mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	300W	75W-75%
Recommended PSU	650W	300W-54%
Power Connector	2x 8-pin	None
Length	279mm	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	18.5	104.9+467%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 690 came in at $999, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 85.1% cheaper ($850 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.5 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 860% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 690	GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP	$999	$149-85%
Performance per Dollar	5.5	52.8+860%
Codename	GK104	TU117
Release	May 3 2012	April 23 2019
Ranking	#414	#323

Search GeForce GTX 690 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.