G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
47.3% HIGHER MSRP
$249 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅89.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 229.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 19.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 89.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 123.3% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 4,813), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $80 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $249, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 229.1% (63.6 vs 19.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 760 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 760

The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 760 scores 4,813 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 123.3%. The GeForce GTX 760 is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1470 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score	4,813	10,749+123%
Architecture	Kepler	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1152	2304+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.378 TFLOPS	6.774 TFLOPS+185%
Boost Clock	1033 MHz	1470 MHz+42%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	96+33%	72
L1 Cache	0.09 MB	2.3 MB+2456%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 760 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 14.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	6 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s+14%	168 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+167%	96-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.3	4.6+7%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 760) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 760) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder	NVDEC 1st gen	NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs	H.264	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 draws 170W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 83.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP	170W	70W-59%
Recommended PSU	500W	300W-40%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	None
Length	241mm	160mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	28.3	153.6+443%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 760 came in at $249, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 32.1% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 19.3 (GeForce GTX 760) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 229.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP	$249	$169-32%
Performance per Dollar	19.3	63.6+230%
Codename	GK104	GA107
Release	June 25 2013	February 2 2024
Ranking	#450	#252

Search GeForce GTX 760 on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.