GeForce GTX 950A vs GeForce GTX 470M SLI
GeForce GTX 950A
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 470M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 950A is positioned at rank 286 and the GeForce GTX 470M SLI is on rank 276, so the GeForce GTX 470M SLI offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 950A
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 470M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 950A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 470M SLI.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 950A | GeForce GTX 470M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 950A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 950A holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $60), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 104.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 950A | GeForce GTX 470M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+104.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950A and GeForce GTX 470M SLI
GeForce GTX 950A
The GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,599 points.
GeForce GTX 470M SLI
The GeForce GTX 470M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 535 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,540 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 950A scores 2,599 and the GeForce GTX 470M SLI reaches 2,540 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 470M SLI uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 576 (GeForce GTX 470M SLI).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | GeForce GTX 470M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,599+2% | 2,540 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+11% | 576 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | GeForce GTX 470M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | GeForce GTX 470M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 32 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 950A draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 470M SLI's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 470M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 470M SLI). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | GeForce GTX 470M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 34.7+2% | 33.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 950A costs 50% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 86.6 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 42.3 (GeForce GTX 470M SLI) — the GeForce GTX 950A offers 104.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 950A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 950A | GeForce GTX 470M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-50% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 86.6+105% | 42.3 |
| Codename | GM107 | N11E-GT |
| Release | March 13 2015 | November 1 2010 |
| Ranking | #621 | #627 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 950A and GeForce GTX 470M SLI
