
GeForce GTX 960
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 960
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌17.8% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅66.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 106.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 960
2015GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅66.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 106.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌17.8% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than GeForce GTX 960?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 960 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 121 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 960 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960
The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 75.3%. The GeForce GTX 960 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1470 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,133 | 10,749+75% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2304+125% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.413 TFLOPS | 6.774 TFLOPS+181% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1470 MHz+25% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 72+13% |
| L1 Cache | 0.38 MB | 2.3 MB+505% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 960 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 960 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 960) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 168 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 960) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce GTX 960) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (2nd Gen) | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 35.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: 6-pin vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 70W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 300W-25% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | None |
| Length | 241mm | 160mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 61.3 | 153.6+151% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 960 launched at $199 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 15.1% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 106.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 960 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $169-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.8 | 63.6+106% |
| Codename | GM206 | GA107 |
| Release | January 22 2015 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #393 | #252 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













