GeForce GTX 960 vs RTX A400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 960 vs RTX A400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 960 vs RTX A400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 960

2015

Why buy it

✅57.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
47.4% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$135 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.8 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

RTX A400

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $64 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 43.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 30.8 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 960 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 960 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 57.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (6,133 vs 5,983), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTX A400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $64 cheaper on MSRP at $135 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 43.8% (44.3 vs 30.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX 960 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 960 vs RTX A400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 960

The GeForce GTX 960 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 22 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1127 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,133 points. Launch price was $199.

RTX A400

The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 960 scores 6,133 and the RTX A400 reaches 5,983 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 960 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 2.413 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 960) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1762 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960	RTX A400
G3D Mark Score	6,133+3%	5,983
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1024+33%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.413 TFLOPS	2.706 TFLOPS+12%
Boost Clock	1178 MHz	1762 MHz+50%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+167%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 960	RTX A400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 960 and 128-bit on the RTX A400.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960	RTX A400
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 960 draws 100W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 960) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 960	RTX A400
TDP	100W	50W-50%
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	75 C	—
Perf/Watt	61.3	119.7+95%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 960 came in at $199, while the RTX A400 launched at $135. On MSRP, RTX A400 was 32.2% cheaper ($64 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.8 (GeForce GTX 960) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the RTX A400 offers 43.8% better value. The newer card here is RTX A400 (2024 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce GTX 960	RTX A400
MSRP	$199	$135-32%
Performance per Dollar	30.8	44.3+44%
Codename	GM206	GA107
Release	January 22 2015	April 16 2024
Ranking	#393	#397

Search GeForce GTX 960 on Amazon

Search RTX A400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.