GeForce GTX 965M SLI vs GeForce GTX 660

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is positioned at rank #205 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 965M SLI

#195

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

406%

#197

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

368%

#198

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

367%

#202

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

334%

#203

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

332%

#205

GeForce GTX 965M SLI

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#206

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

98%

#208

Radeon RX Vega M GL

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

97%

#212

GeForce GTX 780M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

96%

#216

Radeon 8040S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

91%

#217

Radeon R7 +8G

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 660 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 965M SLI.

Insight	GeForce GTX 965M SLI	GeForce GTX 660
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 660 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 965M SLI Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 660 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 965M SLI and GeForce GTX 660

GeForce GTX 965M SLI

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,010 points.

GeForce GTX 660

The GeForce GTX 660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,040 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI scores 4,010 and the GeForce GTX 660 reaches 4,040 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 660 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) vs 960 (GeForce GTX 660). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1033 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 965M SLI	GeForce GTX 660
G3D Mark Score	4,010	4,040
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+113%	960
Boost Clock	950 MHz	1033 MHz+9%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 965M SLI	GeForce GTX 660
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 660 has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 660 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 80.2 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) vs 144.2 GB/s (GeForce GTX 660) — a 79.8% advantage for the GeForce GTX 660. Bus width: 128-bit x2 vs 192-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 965M SLI	GeForce GTX 660
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	3 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	80.2 GB/s x2	144.2 GB/s+80%
Bus Width	128-bit x2	192-bit+50%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 660's 140W — a 60.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 660). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.