GeForce GTX 965M SLI
VS
GeForce RTX 3070

GeForce GTX 965M SLI vs GeForce RTX 3070

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 965M SLI

2015Core: 924 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3070

2020Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1725 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is positioned at rank #205 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 965M SLI

#195
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
406%
#197
368%
#198
367%
#202
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
334%
#203
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
332%
#205
GeForce GTX 965M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#206
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#208
Radeon RX Vega M GL
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#212
GeForce GTX 780M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
96%
#216
Radeon 8040S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
91%
#217
Radeon R7 +8G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
114%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
110%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
109%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
108%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
108%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
107%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
106%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
106%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
105%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
104%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
103%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
103%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
101%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
101%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
101%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
100%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
99%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
98%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
97%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
97%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
95%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
95%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
94%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
94%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
94%
#26
Radeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
94%
#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
94%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
93%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
93%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
93%
#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 3070 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 452.9% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 965M SLI.

InsightGeForce GTX 965M SLIGeForce RTX 3070
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-452.9%)
Leading raw performance (+452.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3070 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 965M SLI and GeForce RTX 3070

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 965M SLI

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,010 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 965M SLI scores 4,010 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 452.9%. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1725 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 965M SLIGeForce RTX 3070
G3D Mark Score
4,010
22,172+453%
Architecture
Maxwell
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
2048
5888+188%
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1725 MHz+82%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 965M SLIGeForce RTX 3070
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 80.2 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 458.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 128-bit x2 vs 256-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 965M SLIGeForce RTX 3070
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
8 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
80.2 GB/s x2
448 GB/s+459%
Bus Width
128-bit x2
256-bit+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 98.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 965M SLIGeForce RTX 3070
TDP
75W-66%
220W
Recommended PSU
350W-46%
650W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
8-pin
Length
242mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
53.5
100.8+88%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 965M SLIGeForce RTX 3070
MSRP
$499
Avg Price (30d)
$200
Codename
GA104
Release
January 5 2015
September 1 2020
Ranking
#370
#63