GeForce GTX 965M SLI vs FirePro W8000
GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Popular choices:
FirePro W8000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is positioned at rank 205 and the FirePro W8000 is on rank 260, so the GeForce GTX 965M SLI offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W8000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 965M SLI.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 965M SLI | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (279mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro W8000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 965M SLI and FirePro W8000
GeForce GTX 965M SLI
The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,010 points.
FirePro W8000
The FirePro W8000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,259 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 965M SLI scores 4,010 versus the FirePro W8000's 4,259 — the FirePro W8000 leads by 6.2%. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is built on Maxwell while the FirePro W8000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) vs 1,792 (FirePro W8000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M SLI | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,010 | 4,259+6% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+14% | 1792 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M SLI | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 965M SLI comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W8000 has 4 GB. The FirePro W8000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit x2 vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M SLI | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit x2+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 965M SLI draws 75W versus the FirePro W8000's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) vs 350W (FirePro W8000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M SLI | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 279mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 58°C |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5+183% | 18.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M SLI | FirePro W8000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $1599 |
| Codename | — | Tahiti |
| Release | January 5 2015 | June 14 2012 |
| Ranking | #370 | #481 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 965M SLI and FirePro W8000
