
GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs CMP 40HX

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Popular choices:

CMP 40HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar CMP 40HX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The CMP 40HX is significantly newer (2021 vs 2014). The CMP 40HX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the CMP 40HX.
| Insight | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The CMP 40HX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $400 for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z, it costs 70% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 231% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+231%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Z and CMP 40HX

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.

CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 and the CMP 40HX reaches 8,749 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the CMP 40HX uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 2,304 (CMP 40HX). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,811 | 8,749 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 5760 ×2+150% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 | 7.603 TFLOPS+51% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1650 MHz+88% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+67% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 0.23 MB | 2.3 MB+900% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the CMP 40HX has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 4 MB (CMP 40HX) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.2+20% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs No (CMP 40HX). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs No.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | No |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | No |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the CMP 40HX's 185W — a 67.9% difference. The CMP 40HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 500W (CMP 40HX). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 185W-51% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 23.5 | 47.3+101% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the CMP 40HX launched at $699 and now averages $120. The CMP 40HX costs 70% less ($280 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 72.9 (CMP 40HX) — the CMP 40HX offers 231.4% better value. The CMP 40HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $699-77% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | $120-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.0 | 72.9+231% |
| Codename | GK110B | TU106 |
| Release | May 28 2014 | February 25 2021 |
| Ranking | #300 | #302 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















