CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX TITAN Black holds the technical lead. Priced at $120 (vs $400), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 247.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+247.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Z and GeForce GTX TITAN Black
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 and the GeForce GTX TITAN Black reaches 9,177 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 980 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,811 | 9,177+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5760 ×2+100% | 2880 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 | 5.645 TFLOPS+12% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 980 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2 | 48 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2 | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) — a 900.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 384-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+100% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s x2 | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2 | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.2+20% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | NVENC 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN Black's 250W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 250W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 600W-14% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 23.5 | 36.7+56% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black launched at $999 and now averages $120. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black costs 70% less ($280 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 76.5 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) — the GeForce GTX TITAN Black offers 247.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $999-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | $120-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.0 | 76.5+248% |
| Codename | GK110B | GK110B |
| Release | May 28 2014 | February 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #300 | #288 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX TITAN Z and GeForce GTX TITAN Black
