
GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Why buy it
- ✅3.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,811 vs 10,749).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2014 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌1674.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+22% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2064.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX TITAN Z across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 22%. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1470 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,811 | 10,749+22% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 5760 ×2+150% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 | 6.774 TFLOPS+34% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1470 MHz+68% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+233% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 0.23 MB | 2.3 MB+900% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX TITAN Z is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z has 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce GTX TITAN Z gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 1901.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z. Memory bus width is 384-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX TITAN Z and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+100% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s x2+100% | 168 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2+300% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 137.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 160mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 70W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 300W-57% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | None |
| Length | 267mm | 160mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 23.5 | 153.6+554% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX TITAN Z came in at $2999, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 94.4% cheaper ($2830 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 2093.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $169-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9 | 63.6+2093% |
| Codename | GK110B | GA107 |
| Release | May 28 2014 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #300 | #252 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















