G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

2014

Why buy it

✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2014 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
400.7% HIGHER MSRP
$2,999 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅109.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $2,400 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1429.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 109.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 205.5% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 8,811), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GTX TITAN Z is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,400 cheaper on MSRP at $599 vs $2,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1429.6% (44.9 vs 2.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 205.5%. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 2475 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	GeForce RTX 4070
G3D Mark Score	8,811	26,919+206%
Architecture	Kepler	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	5760 ×2	5888+2%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.046 TFLOPS ×2	29.15 TFLOPS+478%
Boost Clock	876 MHz	2475 MHz+183%
ROPs	48 ×2	64+33%
TMUs	240 ×2+30%	184
L1 Cache	0.23 MB	5.8 MB+2422%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	36 MB+2300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX TITAN Z is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	GeForce RTX 4070
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 12 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 567.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z. Memory bus width is 384-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX TITAN Z and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	GeForce RTX 4070
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	12 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth	336 GB/s x2	504 GB/s+50%
Bus Width	384-bit x2+100%	192-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	36 MB+2300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	GeForce RTX 4070
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.0	1.3+30%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	GeForce RTX 4070
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC 1st gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 3 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	GeForce RTX 4070
TDP	375W	200W-47%
Recommended PSU	700W	650W-7%
Power Connector	2x 8-pin	8-pin
Length	267mm	304mm
Height	111mm	137mm
Slots	3	3
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	23.5	134.6+473%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX TITAN Z came in at $2999, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 was 80% cheaper ($2400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 1448.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP	$2999	$599-80%
Performance per Dollar	2.9	44.9+1448%
Codename	GK110B	AD104
Release	May 28 2014	April 12 2023
Ranking	#300	#32

Search GeForce GTX TITAN Z on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.