GeForce MX130 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

NVIDIA

GeForce MX130

2017Core: 1122 MHzBoost: 1242 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······

GeForce MX130 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX130 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX130 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX130

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $49 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 70W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • 312.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 322.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 133.3% higher power demand at 70W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 312.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 495.5% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 1,805), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 more expensive on MSRP at $169 vs $120, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 322.8% (63.6 vs 15.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce MX130 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce MX130

The GeForce MX130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1122 MHz to 1242 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,805 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX130 scores 1,805 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 495.5%. The GeForce MX130 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX130) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 0.9539 TFLOPS (GeForce MX130) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1242 MHz vs 1470 MHz.

FeatureGeForce MX130GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score
1,805
10,749+496%
Architecture
Maxwell
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
384
2304+500%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9539 TFLOPS
6.774 TFLOPS+610%
Boost Clock
1242 MHz
1470 MHz+18%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
72+200%
L1 Cache
0.19 MB
2.3 MB+1111%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce MX130 is capped at Upscaling support.

FeatureGeForce MX130GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX130 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 40 GB/s (GeForce MX130) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 320% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX130 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce MX130) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce MX130GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
6 GB+1100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
40 GB/s
168 GB/s+320%
Bus Width
64-bit
96-bit+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX130 draws 30W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 80% difference. The GeForce MX130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX130) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.

FeatureGeForce MX130GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP
30W-57%
70W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Mobile
None
Length
160mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
60.2
153.6+155%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX130 came in at $120, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce MX130 was 29% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (GeForce MX130) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 324% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce MX130GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP
$120-29%
$169
Performance per Dollar
15.0
63.6+324%
Codename
GM108
GA107
Release
November 17 2017
February 2 2024
Ranking
#713
#252

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.