GeForce MX130 vs GeForce RTX 4060

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX130 vs GeForce RTX 4060 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX130 vs GeForce RTX 4060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX130

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $179 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 115W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($120 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅594.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 334.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌283.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 594.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 983% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 1,805), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce MX130 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $179 more expensive on MSRP at $299 vs $120, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 334.6% (65.4 vs 15.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce MX130 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX130

The GeForce MX130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1122 MHz to 1242 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,805 points.

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX130 scores 1,805 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 983%. The GeForce MX130 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce MX130) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 0.9539 TFLOPS (GeForce MX130) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1242 MHz vs 2460 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX130	GeForce RTX 4060
G3D Mark Score	1,805	19,548+983%
Architecture	Maxwell	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	384	3072+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9539 TFLOPS	15.11 TFLOPS+1484%
Boost Clock	1242 MHz	2460 MHz+98%
ROPs	8	48+500%
TMUs	24	96+300%
L1 Cache	0.19 MB	3 MB+1479%
L2 Cache	1 MB	24 MB+2300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce MX130 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce MX130 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce MX130	GeForce RTX 4060
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX130 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 40 GB/s (GeForce MX130) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 580% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX130 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce MX130) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX130	GeForce RTX 4060
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	8 GB+1500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	40 GB/s	272 GB/s+580%
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	24 MB+2300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX130 draws 30W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 117.2% difference. The GeForce MX130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX130) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin.

Feature	GeForce MX130	GeForce RTX 4060
TDP	30W-74%	115W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	Mobile	8-pin
Length	—	240mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	73°C
Perf/Watt	60.2	170.0+182%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX130 came in at $120, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce MX130 was 59.9% cheaper ($179 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.0 (GeForce MX130) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 336% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce MX130	GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP	$120-60%	$299
Performance per Dollar	15.0	65.4+336%
Codename	GM108	AD107
Release	November 17 2017	May 18 2023
Ranking	#713	#84

Search GeForce MX130 on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 4060 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.