GeForce MX570 A vs FirePro W9000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX570 A is positioned at rank 239 and the FirePro W9000 is on rank 317, so the GeForce MX570 A offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570 A

#54

Radeon RX 6800S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

96%

#228

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

525%

#230

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

476%

#231

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

474%

#235

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

431%

#236

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

428%

#238

Arc Graphics 130T

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

100%

#239

GeForce MX570 A

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

100%

#241

GeForce GT 645

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

98%

#251

GeForce 720A

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

93%

#252

GeForce GT 520M

MSRP: $60|Avg: N/A

91%

#253

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200GE

MSRP: $99|Avg: $60

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W9000

#302

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

9593%

#317

FirePro W9000

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150

100%

#318

GRID M60-4Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

99%

#319

Quadro K6000

MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300

99%

#320

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

99%

#321

NVS 510

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

98%

#322

GRID M60-1Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50

96%

#323

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

92%

#324

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

92%

#325

Tesla K20c

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500

90%

#326

GRID M6-1Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

90%

#327

Tesla C2050 / C2070

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30

89%

#328

Quadro FX 380

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

89%

#329

FirePro M7740

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

86%

#330

Quadro FX 570

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

84%

#331

RTXA5000-24Q

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce MX570 A is significantly newer (2022 vs 2012). The GeForce MX570 A likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W9000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce MX570 A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W9000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce MX570 A	FirePro W9000
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Longevity	Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	Standard Size (279mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro W9000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $300 for the GeForce MX570 A, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 98.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce MX570 A	FirePro W9000
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+98.4%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)	✅More affordable ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce MX570 A Benchmark Check

FirePro W9000 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 A and FirePro W9000

GeForce MX570 A

The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

FirePro W9000

The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 and the FirePro W9000 reaches 6,157 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the FirePro W9000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 2,048 (FirePro W9000). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 3.994 TFLOPS (FirePro W9000).

Feature	GeForce MX570 A	FirePro W9000
G3D Mark Score	6,208	6,157
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 1.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS+18%	3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	64	128+100%
L1 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce MX570 A	FirePro W9000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX570 A comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W9000 has 6 GB. The FirePro W9000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX570 A) vs 0.75 MB (FirePro W9000) — the GeForce MX570 A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX570 A	FirePro W9000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	6 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the FirePro W9000's 274W — a 166.6% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 350W (FirePro W9000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce MX570 A	FirePro W9000
TDP	25W-91%	274W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	—	279mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	93°C
Perf/Watt	248.3+1004%	22.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce MX570 A launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the FirePro W9000 launched at $3999 and now averages $150. The FirePro W9000 costs 50% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 41.0 (FirePro W9000) — the FirePro W9000 offers 98.1% better value. The GeForce MX570 A is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2012).