GeForce MX570 A vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX570 A is positioned at rank #239 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570 A
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 264.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX570 A.
| Insight | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-264.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+264.9%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $380 (vs $300), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 188.1% better value per dollar than the GeForce MX570 A.
| Insight | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+188.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($300) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 A and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 264.9%. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce MX570 A) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) with 64 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208 | 22,651+265% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 4352+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+366% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 2535 MHz+119% |
| ROPs | 40 | 48+20% |
| TMUs | 64 | 136+113% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 4.3 MB+115% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 34+113% |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 136+113% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce MX570 A lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX570 A comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570 A) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX570 A) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 288 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 145.9% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-84% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 248.3+75% | 141.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 A launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $380. The GeForce MX570 A costs 21.1% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 187.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-25% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300-21% | $380 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.7 | 59.6+188% |
| Codename | GA107 | AD106 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #387 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX570 A and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
