GeForce MX570 A vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX570 A is positioned at rank 239 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is on rank 5, so the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570 A
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX570 A.
| Insight | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 A and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,314 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q reaches 6,314 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1125 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208 | 6,314+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+105% | 2.304 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz+3% | 1125 MHz |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570 A) vs 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX570 A) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) — the GeForce MX570 A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 112 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q's 30W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-17% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 248.3+18% | 210.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 A is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | — |
| Codename | GA107 | TU117 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #387 | #383 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX570 A and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
