GeForce MX570 A vs Arc A380
GeForce MX570 A
Popular choices:
Arc A380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX570 A is positioned at rank #239 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570 A
Performance Per Dollar Arc A380
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A380 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX570 A.
| Insight | GeForce MX570 A | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc A380 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $119 versus $300 for the GeForce MX570 A, it costs 60% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 155.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce MX570 A | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+155.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($119) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 A and Arc A380
GeForce MX570 A
The GeForce MX570 A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
Arc A380
The Arc A380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 14 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,301 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 A scores 6,208 and the Arc A380 reaches 6,301 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 A is built on Ampere while the Arc A380 uses Generation 12.7, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 1,024 (Arc A380). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570 A) vs 4.198 TFLOPS (Arc A380). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2050 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce MX570 A) vs 8 (Arc A380) with 64 Tensor cores vs 128.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,208 | 6,301+1% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+13% | 4.198 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 2050 MHz+77% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16+100% | 8 |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 128+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX570 A comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A380 has 6 GB. The Arc A380 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570 A) vs 186 GB/s (Arc A380) — a 93.8% advantage for the Arc A380. Bus width: 64-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX570 A) vs 4 MB (Arc A380) — the Arc A380 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 186 GB/s+94% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 96-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 A draws 25W versus the Arc A380's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce MX570 A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570 A) vs 300W (Arc A380). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-67% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Length | — | 190mm |
| Height | — | 114mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 59 |
| Perf/Watt | 248.3+196% | 84.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 A launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Arc A380 launched at $149 and now averages $119. The Arc A380 costs 60.3% less ($181 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.7 (GeForce MX570 A) vs 52.9 (Arc A380) — the Arc A380 offers 155.6% better value.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 A | Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $149-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $119-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.7 | 52.9+156% |
| Codename | GA107 | DG2-128 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | June 14 2022 |
| Ranking | #387 | #384 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX570 A and Arc A380
