
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M295X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+130.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 178.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌23400% longer card at 235mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 235mm, a 234mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,150 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌20.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅+130.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 178.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 235mm, a 234mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌23400% longer card at 235mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,150 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌20.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon R9 M295X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M295X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 58 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon R9 M295X

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M295X
The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 5,150 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 130.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+131% | 5,150 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+203% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M295X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) — a 27.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+27% | 176 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M295X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 63.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 235mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-48% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 235mm | 1mm |
| Height | 124mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+344% | 20.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 17% less ($51 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 17.2 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 177.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-17% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+178% | 17.2 |
| Codename | GA106 | Amethyst |
| Release | January 4 2022 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #224 | #437 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













