
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 590
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅8.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 43% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 33.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Radeon RX 590
2018Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌12% HIGHER MSRP$279 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Radeon RX 590
2018Why buy it
- ✅8.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 43% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 33.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌12% HIGHER MSRP$279 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than Radeon RX 590?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 590 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 27 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 335 FPS |
| high | 357 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 105 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 403 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 335 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 268 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 101 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon RX 590

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

Radeon RX 590
Radeon RX 590
The Radeon RX 590 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,315 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the Radeon RX 590's 9,315 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 27.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 590 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 590). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 590). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 1545 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,892+28% | 9,315 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.986 TFLOPS+26% | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1755 MHz+14% | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 144+80% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+346% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 590 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 590 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 590) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 590. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 256 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 590). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 590). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 590).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 590's 175W — a 29.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (Radeon RX 590). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 235mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-26% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 235mm | 241mm |
| Height | 124mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 91.5+72% | 53.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 590 launched at $279. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 10.8% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 33.4 (Radeon RX 590) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 43.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-11% | $279 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.8+43% | 33.4 |
| Codename | GA106 | Polaris 30 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | November 15 2018 |
| Ranking | #224 | #285 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













