G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 241.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 130W instead of 165W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT RX 6850M XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

2022

Why buy it

✅37.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌
301.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌26.9% higher power demand at 165W vs 130W.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 241.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 130W instead of 165W, a 35W reduction.

Why buy it

✅37.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT RX 6850M XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌
301.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌26.9% higher power demand at 165W vs 130W.

Quick Answers

So, is RadeonT RX 6850M XT better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?

Yes. RadeonT RX 6850M XT is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 37.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 17.7% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 12 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RadeonT RX 6850M XT is about 301.6% more expensive on MSRP at $1,000 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 37.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 17.7% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RadeonT RX 6850M XT is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than RadeonT RX 6850M XT?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (130W vs 165W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $249 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of RadeonT RX 6850M XT. The trade-off is that RadeonT RX 6850M XT currently gives you 17.7% higher G3D Mark and 37.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

RadeonT RX 6850M XT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
1080p
low	130 FPS	179 FPS
medium	113 FPS	159 FPS
high	99 FPS	145 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	122 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	145 FPS
medium	96 FPS	117 FPS
high	81 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	97 FPS
4K
low	64 FPS	87 FPS
medium	57 FPS	73 FPS
high	39 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open RadeonT RX 6850M XT

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
1080p
low	239 FPS	446 FPS
medium	206 FPS	365 FPS
high	164 FPS	296 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	243 FPS
1440p
low	163 FPS	281 FPS
medium	135 FPS	229 FPS
high	112 FPS	195 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	162 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	126 FPS
medium	74 FPS	107 FPS
high	62 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	69 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open RadeonT RX 6850M XT

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
1080p
low	535 FPS	630 FPS
medium	428 FPS	504 FPS
high	357 FPS	420 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	315 FPS
1440p
low	401 FPS	472 FPS
medium	321 FPS	378 FPS
high	268 FPS	315 FPS
ultra	201 FPS	236 FPS
4K
low	268 FPS	315 FPS
medium	214 FPS	252 FPS
high	178 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	157 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open RadeonT RX 6850M XT

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
1080p
low	467 FPS	630 FPS
medium	414 FPS	504 FPS
high	335 FPS	420 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	315 FPS
1440p
low	372 FPS	472 FPS
medium	321 FPS	378 FPS
high	236 FPS	315 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	236 FPS
4K
low	199 FPS	315 FPS
medium	175 FPS	252 FPS
high	150 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	157 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Open RadeonT RX 6850M XT

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and RadeonT RX 6850M XT

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,992 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 11,892 versus the RadeonT RX 6850M XT's 13,992 — the RadeonT RX 6850M XT leads by 17.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on Ampere while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 2,560 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Raw compute: 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Boost clocks: 1755 MHz vs 2581 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 40 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) with 80 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
G3D Mark Score	11,892	13,992+18%
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2560	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.986 TFLOPS	13.21 TFLOPS+47%
Boost Clock	1755 MHz	2581 MHz+47%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	80	160+100%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB+400%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%
Ray Tracing Cores	20	40+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT has 12 GB. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 3 MB (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the RadeonT RX 6850M XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	12 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 12.2 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 3.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM draws 130W versus the RadeonT RX 6850M XT's 165W — a 23.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 500W (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 235mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
TDP	130W-21%	165W
Recommended PSU	450W-10%	500W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	235mm	0mm
Height	124mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	91.5+8%	84.8

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 MSRP, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT launched at $1000. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 75.1% less ($751 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 14.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 241.4% better value.