CPU
GPU
GeForce2 MX 100/200
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 438900% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce2 MX 100/200.
| Insight | GeForce2 MX 100/200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-438900%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+438900%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce2 MX 100/200 and GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
GeForce2 MX 100/200
The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,170 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce2 MX 100/200 scores 3 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU's 13,170 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU leads by 438900%. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX 100/200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3 | 13,170+438900% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 3584+833% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7972 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+1498% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1777 MHz+71% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 24 | 112+367% |
| L1 Cache | 0.14 MB | 3.5 MB+2400% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce2 MX 100/200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce2 MX 100/200 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX 100/200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 6 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.4. OpenGL: 1.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX 100/200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 12 Ultimate+71% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 4.6+283% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Decoder: None vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX 100/200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | None | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce2 MX 100/200 draws 10W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU's 170W — a 177.8% difference. The GeForce2 MX 100/200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce2 MX 100/200) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 55 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce2 MX 100/200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-94% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 165mm | — |
| Height | 64mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 55-27% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 77.5+25733% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce2 MX 100/200 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | — |
| Codename | GP108 | GA106 |
| Release | May 17 2017 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #657 | #147 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce2 MX 100/200 and GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
