GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs GeForce FX 5200SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is positioned at rank 741 and the GeForce FX 5200SE is on rank 373, so the GeForce FX 5200SE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 440 Go 64M

#731

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

90475%

#733

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

82017%

#734

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

81800%

#738

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

74383%

#739

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

73875%

#741

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#742

RADEON 9000

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

83%

#743

RADEON 9200 SE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $15

83%

#744

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

67%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

50%

#746

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

50%

#747

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

42%

#748

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

33%

#749

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

33%

#750

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

25%

#751

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

25%

#752

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

25%

#753

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

25%

#754

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

17%

#755

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

8%

#756

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

8%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5200SE

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

60450%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

58075%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

57400%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

57300%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

57183%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

56858%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

56142%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

55933%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

55417%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

55267%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

54600%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

54483%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

53500%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

53467%

#358

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

66667%

#373

GeForce FX 5200SE

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

100%

#374

RADEON 9800 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $30

92%

#375

GeForce FX 5200

MSRP: $70|Avg: $25

92%

#376

GeForce PCX 5300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

83%

#377

GeForce FX 5900

MSRP: $399|Avg: $20

75%

#378

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

75%

#379

GeForce FX 5100

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

67%

#380

GeForce FX 5600XT

MSRP: $129|Avg: $10

58%

#381

GeForce FX 5600

MSRP: $200|Avg: $10

58%

#382

GeForce3 Ti 200

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

25%

#383

GeForce4 Ti 4200

MSRP: $199|Avg: $5

25%

#384

GeForce4 Ti 4600

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

17%

#385

GeForce4 MX 460

MSRP: $179|Avg: $15

17%

#386

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

17%

#387

GeForce4 Ti 4400

MSRP: $299|Avg: $49

17%

#388

GeForce4 Ti 4800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

17%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce FX 5200SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 100% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce4 440 Go 64M.

Insight	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce FX 5200SE
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-100%)	✅Leading raw performance (+100%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX 5200SE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce4 440 Go 64M Benchmark Check

GeForce FX 5200SE Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 440 Go 64M and GeForce FX 5200SE

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

GeForce FX 5200SE

The GeForce FX 5200SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12 points. Launch price was $89.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 440 Go 64M scores 6 versus the GeForce FX 5200SE's 12 — the GeForce FX 5200SE leads by 100%. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is built on Kepler while the GeForce FX 5200SE uses Rankine, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 288 (GeForce FX 5200SE). Raw compute: 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200SE).

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce FX 5200SE
G3D Mark Score	6	12+100%
Architecture	Kepler	Rankine
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384+33%	288
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5445 TFLOPS	0.8479 TFLOPS+56%
ROPs	16	24+50%
TMUs	32	48+50%
L1 Cache	32 KB	384 KB+1100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce FX 5200SE
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 384 KB (GeForce FX 5200SE) — the GeForce FX 5200SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce FX 5200SE
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200SE). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce FX 5200SE
DirectX	7.0	9.0a+29%
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
OpenGL	1.5	1.5
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs None (GeForce FX 5200SE). Decoder: MPEG-2 VPE vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5200SE).

Feature	GeForce4 440 Go 64M	GeForce FX 5200SE
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	MPEG-2 VPE	None
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M draws 32W versus the GeForce FX 5200SE's 150W — a 129.7% difference. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5200SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 70.