
GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs GeForce FX 5600XT

GeForce4 440 Go 64M
Popular choices:

GeForce FX 5600XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is positioned at rank 741 and the GeForce FX 5600XT is on rank 380, so the GeForce FX 5600XT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 440 Go 64M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5600XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5600XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 50% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce4 440 Go 64M.
| Insight | GeForce4 440 Go 64M | GeForce FX 5600XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-50%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+50%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX 5600XT remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 440 Go 64M and GeForce FX 5600XT

GeForce4 440 Go 64M
The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

GeForce FX 5600XT
The GeForce FX 5600XT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 440 Go 64M scores 6 versus the GeForce FX 5600XT's 9 — the GeForce FX 5600XT leads by 50%. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is built on Kepler while the GeForce FX 5600XT uses Rankine, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 336 (GeForce FX 5600XT). Raw compute: 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5600XT).
| Feature | GeForce4 440 Go 64M | GeForce FX 5600XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6 | 9+50% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Rankine |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+14% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5445 TFLOPS | 1.089 TFLOPS+100% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 56+75% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 448 KB+1300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce4 440 Go 64M | GeForce FX 5600XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 512 KB (GeForce FX 5600XT) — the GeForce FX 5600XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce4 440 Go 64M | GeForce FX 5600XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5600XT). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce4 440 Go 64M | GeForce FX 5600XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 7.0 | 9.0a+29% |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce4 440 Go 64M draws 32W versus the GeForce FX 5600XT's 150W — a 129.7% difference. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5600XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 55°C.
| Feature | GeForce4 440 Go 64M | GeForce FX 5600XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 32W-79% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 55°C-35% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2+100% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce4 440 Go 64M | GeForce FX 5600XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $10 |
| Codename | GK107 | GF114 |
| Release | October 1 2012 | May 17 2011 |
| Ranking | #903 | #605 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















