GeForce4 440 Go 64M
VS
GeForce FX 5600XT

GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs GeForce FX 5600XT

NVIDIA

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

2012Core: Up to 710 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5600XT

2011Core: 810 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is positioned at rank 741 and the GeForce FX 5600XT is on rank 380, so the GeForce FX 5600XT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 440 Go 64M

#731
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
90475%
#733
82017%
#734
81800%
#738
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
74383%
#739
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
73875%
#741
GeForce4 440 Go 64M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#742
RADEON 9000
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
83%
#743
RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
83%
#744
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
67%
#745
MOBILITY RADEON 9000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
50%
#746
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
50%
#747
GeForce4 MX 420
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
42%
#748
RADEON 9200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
33%
#749
RADEON 9250
MSRP: $79|Avg: $25
33%
#750
RADEON 7200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $45
25%
#751
GeForce4 MX 440
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
25%
#752
GeForce 256
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
25%
#753
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
25%
#754
GeForce2 MX
MSRP: $129|Avg: $49
17%
#755
GeForce3
MSRP: $499|Avg: $49
8%
#756
GeForce4 440
MSRP: $469|Avg: $49
8%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5600XT

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
103629%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
99557%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
98400%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
98229%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
98029%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
97471%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
96243%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
95886%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
95000%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
94743%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
93600%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
93400%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
91714%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
91657%
#365
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
114286%
#380
GeForce FX 5600XT
MSRP: $129|Avg: $10
100%
#381
GeForce FX 5600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
100%
#382
GeForce3 Ti 200
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
43%
#383
GeForce4 Ti 4200
MSRP: $199|Avg: $5
43%
#384
GeForce4 Ti 4800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
29%
#385
GeForce4 Ti 4400
MSRP: $299|Avg: $49
29%
#386
GeForce4 MX 460
MSRP: $179|Avg: $15
29%
#387
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
29%
#388
GeForce4 Ti 4600
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
29%
#389
RADEON 7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $50
29%
#390
GeForce3 Ti 500
MSRP: $349|Avg: $49
14%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce FX 5600XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 50% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce4 440 Go 64M.

InsightGeForce4 440 Go 64MGeForce FX 5600XT
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-50%)
Leading raw performance (+50%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX 5600XT remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 440 Go 64M and GeForce FX 5600XT

NVIDIA

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5600XT

The GeForce FX 5600XT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9 points. Launch price was $199.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 440 Go 64M scores 6 versus the GeForce FX 5600XT's 9 — the GeForce FX 5600XT leads by 50%. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is built on Kepler while the GeForce FX 5600XT uses Rankine, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 336 (GeForce FX 5600XT). Raw compute: 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5600XT).

FeatureGeForce4 440 Go 64MGeForce FX 5600XT
G3D Mark Score
6
9+50%
Architecture
Kepler
Rankine
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384+14%
336
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5445 TFLOPS
1.089 TFLOPS+100%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
56+75%
L1 Cache
32 KB
448 KB+1300%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce4 440 Go 64MGeForce FX 5600XT
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 512 KB (GeForce FX 5600XT) — the GeForce FX 5600XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce4 440 Go 64MGeForce FX 5600XT
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5600XT). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce4 440 Go 64MGeForce FX 5600XT
DirectX
7.0
9.0a+29%
OpenGL
1.5
1.5
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M draws 32W versus the GeForce FX 5600XT's 150W — a 129.7% difference. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5600XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 55°C.

FeatureGeForce4 440 Go 64MGeForce FX 5600XT
TDP
32W-79%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85
55°C-35%
Perf/Watt
0.2+100%
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce4 440 Go 64MGeForce FX 5600XT
MSRP
$129
Avg Price (30d)
$10
Codename
GK107
GF114
Release
October 1 2012
May 17 2011
Ranking
#903
#605