GeForce4 440 Go 64M
VS
GeForce FX 5500

GeForce4 440 Go 64M vs GeForce FX 5500

NVIDIA

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

2012Core: Up to 710 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5500

2021Core: 1065 MHzBoost: 1320 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is positioned at rank 741 and the GeForce FX 5500 is on rank 736, so the GeForce FX 5500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 440 Go 64M

#731
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
90475%
#733
82017%
#734
81800%
#738
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
74383%
#739
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
73875%
#741
GeForce4 440 Go 64M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#742
RADEON 9000
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
83%
#743
RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
83%
#744
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
67%
#745
MOBILITY RADEON 9000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
50%
#746
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
50%
#747
GeForce4 MX 420
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
42%
#748
RADEON 9200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
33%
#749
RADEON 9250
MSRP: $79|Avg: $25
33%
#750
RADEON 7200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $45
25%
#751
GeForce4 MX 440
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
25%
#752
GeForce 256
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
25%
#753
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
25%
#754
GeForce2 MX
MSRP: $129|Avg: $49
17%
#755
GeForce3
MSRP: $499|Avg: $49
8%
#756
GeForce4 440
MSRP: $469|Avg: $49
8%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5500

#726
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
49350%
#728
44736%
#729
44618%
#733
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
40573%
#734
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
40295%
#736
GeForce FX 5500
MSRP: $37|Avg: $30
100%
#737
RADEON 9500
MSRP: $179|Avg: $30
91%
#738
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
91%
#739
RADEON X850 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
73%
#740
RADEON 9800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
68%
#742
RADEON 9000
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
45%
#743
RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
45%
#744
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
36%
#745
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
27%
#746
MOBILITY RADEON 9000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
27%
#747
GeForce4 MX 420
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
23%
#748
RADEON 9250
MSRP: $79|Avg: $25
18%
#749
RADEON 9200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
18%
#750
GeForce 256
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
14%
#751
GeForce4 MX 440
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
14%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce FX 5500 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2012). The GeForce FX 5500 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce FX 5500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce4 440 Go 64M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce4 440 Go 64MGeForce FX 5500
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)
Leading raw performance (+33.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX 5500 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce4 440 Go 64M and GeForce FX 5500

NVIDIA

GeForce4 440 Go 64M

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5500

The GeForce FX 5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1320 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce4 440 Go 64M scores 6 versus the GeForce FX 5500's 8 — the GeForce FX 5500 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M is built on Kepler while the GeForce FX 5500 uses Rankine, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 1,024 (GeForce FX 5500). Raw compute: 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5500).

FeatureGeForce4 440 Go 64MGeForce FX 5500
G3D Mark Score
6
8+33%
Architecture
Kepler
Rankine
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
384
1024+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5445 TFLOPS
2.703 TFLOPS+396%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
0.03 MB
2 MB+6567%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce4 440 Go 64MGeForce FX 5500
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5500 has 256 MB. The GeForce4 440 Go 64M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 2 MB (GeForce FX 5500) — the GeForce FX 5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce4 440 Go 64MGeForce FX 5500
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5500). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce4 440 Go 64MGeForce FX 5500
DirectX
7.0
9.0a+29%
Vulkan
N/A
None
OpenGL
1.5
1.5
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs No (GeForce FX 5500). Decoder: MPEG-2 VPE vs No.

FeatureGeForce4 440 Go 64MGeForce FX 5500
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
MPEG-2 VPE
No
Codecs
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce4 440 Go 64M draws 32W versus the GeForce FX 5500's 25W — a 24.6% difference. The GeForce FX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce4 440 Go 64M) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 171mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce4 440 Go 64MGeForce FX 5500
TDP
32W
25W-22%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
0mm
171mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85
70°C-18%
Perf/Watt
0.2
0.3+50%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce FX 5500 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce4 440 Go 64MGeForce FX 5500
MSRP
$37
Avg Price (30d)
$30
Codename
GK107
TU117S
Release
October 1 2012
December 17 2021
Ranking
#903
#468