CPU
GPU
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is positioned at rank #264 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM.
| Insight | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.
Graphics Performance
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) scores 5,500 and the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM reaches 5,474 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is built on Xe LPG while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 980 MHz.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,474 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | Kepler |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4 | 1344+33500% |
| Boost Clock | 1950 MHz+99% | 980 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+586% | 112 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | 1st Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM's 170W — a 167.6% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-91% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 366.7+1039% | 32.2 |
Value Analysis
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | — |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | GK104 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | September 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #496 | #417 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
