Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) vs GeForce RTX 4070
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is positioned at rank #264 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 389.4% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake).
| Insight | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-389.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+389.4%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $550 for the GeForce RTX 4070, it costs 82% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 12.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+12.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) and GeForce RTX 4070
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) scores 5,500 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 389.4%. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is built on Xe LPG while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 2475 MHz.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 26,919+389% |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4 | 5888+147100% |
| Boost Clock | 1950 MHz | 2475 MHz+27% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 5.8 MB+673% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 504 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 192-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) draws 15W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 172.1% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 304mm, occupying 0 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 304mm |
| Height | 0mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 366.7+172% | 134.6 |
Value Analysis
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 and now averages $550. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) costs 81.8% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.0 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) vs 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) offers 12.5% better value.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-50% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-82% | $550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.0+12% | 48.9 |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | AD104 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #496 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) and GeForce RTX 4070
