Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs GeForce GTX 950
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 950
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 950 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 950.
| Insight | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and GeForce GTX 950
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
GeForce GTX 950
The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.
Graphics Performance
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 and the GeForce GTX 950 reaches 5,357 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the GeForce GTX 950 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 950). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 1188 MHz.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500+3% | 5,357 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4 | 768+19100% |
| Boost Clock | 1950 MHz+64% | 1188 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 950 has 2 GB. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 106 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC 2nd Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 950).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC 2nd Gen |
| Decoder | QuickSync | NVDEC 2nd Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 950's 90W — a 142.9% difference. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 202mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-83% | 90W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 202mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 366.7+516% | 59.5 |
Value Analysis
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 950 launched at $159 and now averages $48. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) costs 100+% less ($48 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 111.6 (GeForce GTX 950) — the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $159 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $48 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 111.6 |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | GM206 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | August 20 2015 |
| Ranking | #494 | #425 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and GeForce GTX 950
