GRID K280Q vs GeForce GTX 675MX
GRID K280Q
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 675MX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID K280Q is positioned at rank 323 and the GeForce GTX 675MX is on rank 75, so the GeForce GTX 675MX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID K280Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 675MX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 675MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K280Q.
| Insight | GRID K280Q | GeForce GTX 675MX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 675MX remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID K280Q and GeForce GTX 675MX
GRID K280Q
The GRID K280Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,840 points. Launch price was $1,875.
GeForce GTX 675MX
The GeForce GTX 675MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,951 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K280Q scores 2,840 and the GeForce GTX 675MX reaches 2,951 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K280Q is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 675MX uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K280Q) vs 960 (GeForce GTX 675MX). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K280Q) vs 1.256 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 675MX).
| Feature | GRID K280Q | GeForce GTX 675MX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,840 | 2,951+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+60% | 960 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS+82% | 1.256 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+60% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K280Q | GeForce GTX 675MX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID K280Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 675MX has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 675MX offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GRID K280Q | GeForce GTX 675MX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (GRID K280Q) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675MX). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID K280Q | GeForce GTX 675MX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12 (11_0)+9% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K280Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 675MX's 100W — a 76.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 675MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K280Q) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 675MX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GRID K280Q | GeForce GTX 675MX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 100W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.6 | 29.5+134% |
Value Analysis
The GRID K280Q is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GRID K280Q | GeForce GTX 675MX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | — |
| Codename | GK104 | GK104 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | October 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #595 | #588 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K280Q and GeForce GTX 675MX
