GRID M10-0Q vs GeForce GT 635
GRID M10-0Q
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 635
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M10-0Q is positioned at rank 389 and the GeForce GT 635 is on rank 152, so the GeForce GT 635 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-0Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 635
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GRID M10-0Q is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The GRID M10-0Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 635 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 635 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-0Q.
| Insight | GRID M10-0Q | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 635 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 635 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $150), it costs 87% less, resulting in a 663.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M10-0Q | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+663.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-0Q and GeForce GT 635
GRID M10-0Q
The GRID M10-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 796 points.
GeForce GT 635
The GeForce GT 635 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 810 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-0Q scores 796 and the GeForce GT 635 reaches 810 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-0Q is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 635 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 352 (GeForce GT 635). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0Q) vs 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 635).
| Feature | GRID M10-0Q | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 796 | 810+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+82% | 352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS+95% | 0.8554 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 44+10% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 704 KB+120% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-0Q | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-0Q) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 635) — the GRID M10-0Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-0Q | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 635). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID M10-0Q | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-0Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GT 635's 200W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce GT 635 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-0Q) vs 200W (GeForce GT 635). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 1mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GRID M10-0Q | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 200W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 200W-43% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 1mm | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.5 | 4.0+14% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-0Q launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GT 635 launched at $99 and now averages $20. The GeForce GT 635 costs 86.7% less ($130 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.3 (GRID M10-0Q) vs 40.5 (GeForce GT 635) — the GeForce GT 635 offers 664.2% better value. The GRID M10-0Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | GRID M10-0Q | GeForce GT 635 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $99-95% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $20-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.3 | 40.5+664% |
| Codename | GM107 | GF100 |
| Release | May 18 2016 | May 31 2010 |
| Ranking | #622 | #618 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M10-0Q and GeForce GT 635
