
GRID M10-2B
Popular choices:

Seria Radeon HD 7700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID M10-2B is positioned at rank #372 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-2B
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M10-2B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Seria Radeon HD 7700.
| Insight | GRID M10-2B | Seria Radeon HD 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Seria Radeon HD 7700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Seria Radeon HD 7700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $80), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 160.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M10-2B | Seria Radeon HD 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+160.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-2B and Seria Radeon HD 7700

GRID M10-2B
The GRID M10-2B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,644 points.

Seria Radeon HD 7700
The Seria Radeon HD 7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-2B scores 1,644 and the Seria Radeon HD 7700 reaches 1,604 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Seria Radeon HD 7700 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2B) vs 2,048 (Seria Radeon HD 7700). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2B) vs 3.789 TFLOPS (Seria Radeon HD 7700). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Seria Radeon HD 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,644+2% | 1,604 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+27% | 3.789 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+27% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Seria Radeon HD 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-2B) vs 0.75 MB (Seria Radeon HD 7700) — the GRID M10-2B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Seria Radeon HD 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-2B draws 225W versus the Seria Radeon HD 7700's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID M10-2B is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2B) vs 450W (Seria Radeon HD 7700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Seria Radeon HD 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-10% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 7.3+14% | 6.4 |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-2B launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Seria Radeon HD 7700 launched at $159 and now averages $30. The Seria Radeon HD 7700 costs 62.5% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.6 (GRID M10-2B) vs 53.5 (Seria Radeon HD 7700) — the Seria Radeon HD 7700 offers 159.7% better value. The GRID M10-2B is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GRID M10-2B | Seria Radeon HD 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $159-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | $30-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.6 | 53.5+160% |
| Codename | GM204 | Tahiti |
| Release | August 30 2015 | January 9 2012 |
| Ranking | #433 | #431 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















