
GRID M10-8Q vs GRID M10-2Q

GRID M10-8Q
Popular choices:

GRID M10-2Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M10-8Q is positioned at rank 346 and the GRID M10-2Q is on rank 342, so the GRID M10-2Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-8Q
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-2Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M10-2Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-8Q.
| Insight | GRID M10-8Q | GRID M10-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID M10-2Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID M10-2Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $500), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 245.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M10-8Q | GRID M10-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+245.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-8Q and GRID M10-2Q

GRID M10-8Q
The GRID M10-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points.

GRID M10-2Q
The GRID M10-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-8Q scores 2,595 and the GRID M10-2Q reaches 2,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-8Q is built on Maxwell while the GRID M10-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-8Q) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-2Q). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-8Q) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2Q). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | GRID M10-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,595 | 2,692+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2048+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+189% |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz+11% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 768 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | GRID M10-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | GRID M10-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GRID M10-8Q) vs 12_1 (GRID M10-2Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | GRID M10-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-8Q draws 225W versus the GRID M10-2Q's 225W — a 0% difference. The GRID M10-2Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-8Q) vs 350W (GRID M10-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | GRID M10-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.5 | 12.0+4% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-8Q launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GRID M10-2Q launched at $2500 and now averages $150. The GRID M10-2Q costs 70% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.2 (GRID M10-8Q) vs 17.9 (GRID M10-2Q) — the GRID M10-2Q offers 244.2% better value. The GRID M10-8Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | GRID M10-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $150-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.2 | 17.9+244% |
| Codename | GM107 | GM204 |
| Release | May 18 2016 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #622 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











