GRID M10-8Q vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GRID M10-8Q
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID M10-8Q is positioned at rank #346 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-8Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is significantly newer (2022 vs 2016). The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M10-8Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 383% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-8Q.
| Insight | GRID M10-8Q | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-383%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+383%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $209 versus $500 for the GRID M10-8Q, it costs 58% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1055.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M10-8Q | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1055.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($209) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-8Q and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GRID M10-8Q
The GRID M10-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,595 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GRID M10-8Q scores 2,595 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 383%. The GRID M10-8Q is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID M10-8Q) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-8Q) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,595 | 12,535+383% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2560+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS | 9.098 TFLOPS+444% |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | 1777 MHz+36% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 0.31 MB | 2.5 MB+706% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M10-8Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GRID M10-8Q) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (4th Gen) (GRID M10-8Q) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GRID M10-8Q) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB).
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (4th Gen) | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (2nd Gen) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-8Q draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 53.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-8Q) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 66°C.
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 130W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 66°C-22% |
| Perf/Watt | 11.5 | 96.4+738% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-8Q launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 and now averages $209. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 58.2% less ($291 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.2 (GRID M10-8Q) vs 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 1053.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GRID M10-8Q | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $249-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $209-58% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.2 | 60.0+1054% |
| Codename | GM107 | GA106 |
| Release | May 18 2016 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #622 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M10-8Q and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
