
GRID P40-2Q vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GRID P40-2Q
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID P40-2Q is positioned at rank #310 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-2Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P40-2Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 780 Ti.
| Insight | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 780 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $42 (vs $340), it costs 88% less, resulting in a 700.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+700.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($340) | ✅More affordable ($42) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-2Q and GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GRID P40-2Q
The GRID P40-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,581 points.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,469 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-2Q scores 9,581 and the GeForce GTX 780 Ti reaches 9,469 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-2Q) vs 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 928 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,581+1% | 9,469 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2880+41% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 5.345 TFLOPS+11% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+27% | 928 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 128 | 240+88% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+220% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P40-2Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 3 GB. The GRID P40-2Q offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P40-2Q) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) — the GRID P40-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (2x) (GRID P40-2Q) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-2Q) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti).
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 (2x) | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-2Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 780 Ti's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID P40-2Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID P40-2Q) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 83°C.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-10% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 83°C-2% |
| Perf/Watt | 42.6+12% | 37.9 |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-2Q launched at $5699 MSRP and currently averages $340, while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti launched at $699 and now averages $42. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti costs 87.6% less ($298 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.2 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 225.5 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 780 Ti offers 699.6% better value. The GRID P40-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5699 | $699-88% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $340 | $42-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.2 | 225.5+700% |
| Codename | GM204 | GK110B |
| Release | August 30 2015 | November 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #433 | #278 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















