
GRID P40-3Q vs FirePro W8100

GRID P40-3Q
Popular choices:

FirePro W8100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P40-3Q is positioned at rank 341 and the FirePro W8100 is on rank 254, so the FirePro W8100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-3Q
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W8100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P40-3Q.
| Insight | GRID P40-3Q | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W8100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W8100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $200 (vs $5,699), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 2854.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P40-3Q | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2854.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,699) | ✅More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-3Q and FirePro W8100

GRID P40-3Q
The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.

FirePro W8100
The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-3Q scores 6,570 and the FirePro W8100 reaches 6,812 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-3Q is built on Kepler while the FirePro W8100 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 2,560 (FirePro W8100). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-3Q) vs 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100).
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,570 | 6,812+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2560+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 4.219 TFLOPS+84% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 128 | 160+25% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 640 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P40-3Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W8100 has 8 GB. The FirePro W8100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID P40-3Q) vs 1 MB (FirePro W8100) — the FirePro W8100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GRID P40-3Q) vs 12 (FirePro W8100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Tesla NVENC x24 (GRID P40-3Q) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100). Decoder: Tesla NVDEC vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-3Q) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W8100).
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Tesla NVENC x24 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | Tesla NVDEC | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-3Q draws 225W versus the FirePro W8100's 220W — a 2.2% difference. The FirePro W8100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-3Q) vs 350W (FirePro W8100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 87°C.
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 220W-2% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C-2% | 87°C |
| Perf/Watt | 29.2 | 31.0+6% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-3Q launched at $5699 MSRP and currently averages $5699, while the FirePro W8100 launched at $2499 and now averages $200. The FirePro W8100 costs 96.5% less ($5499 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 34.1 (FirePro W8100) — the FirePro W8100 offers 2741.7% better value. The FirePro W8100 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5699 | $2499-56% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5699 | $200-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 34.1+2742% |
| Codename | GK104 | Hawaii |
| Release | June 28 2013 | June 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #628 | #361 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












