GRID P40-3Q vs GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GRID P40-3Q
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID P40-3Q is positioned at rank #341 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-3Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P40-3Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2.
| Insight | GRID P40-3Q | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $5,699), it costs 99% less, resulting in a 9297.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P40-3Q | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+9297.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,699) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-3Q and GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GRID P40-3Q
The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-3Q scores 6,570 and the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 reaches 6,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-3Q is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-3Q) vs 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2).
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,570+1% | 6,500 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2304+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 4.156 TFLOPS+82% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 128 | 192+50% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID P40-3Q) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) — the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.5 MB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-3Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID P40-3Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-3Q) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-10% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 29.2+12% | 26.0 |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-3Q launched at $5699 MSRP and currently averages $5699, while the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 launched at $649 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 costs 98.9% less ($5639 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 108.3 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) — the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 offers 8925% better value.
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5699 | $649-89% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5699 | $60-99% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 108.3+8925% |
| Codename | GK104 | GK110B |
| Release | June 28 2013 | September 10 2013 |
| Ranking | #628 | #487 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P40-3Q and GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
