
GRID T4-1Q vs GeForce GTX 750

GRID T4-1Q
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID T4-1Q is positioned at rank #304 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID T4-1Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID T4-1Q.
| Insight | GRID T4-1Q | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 750 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $600), it costs 94% less, resulting in a 1619% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID T4-1Q | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1619%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600) | ✅More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID T4-1Q and GeForce GTX 750

GRID T4-1Q
The GRID T4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,303 points.

GeForce GTX 750
The GeForce GTX 750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,312 points. Launch price was $119.
Graphics Performance
The GRID T4-1Q scores 3,303 and the GeForce GTX 750 reaches 3,312 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID T4-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 750 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 750). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-1Q) vs 1.111 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1085 MHz.
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,303 | 3,312 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+300% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+334% | 1.111 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+9% | 1085 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 12_0 (GeForce GTX 750). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID T4-1Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 750's 55W — a 121.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID T4-1Q) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 1mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 55W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 1mm | 145mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 14.7 | 60.2+310% |
Value Analysis
The GRID T4-1Q launched at $1880 MSRP and currently averages $600, while the GeForce GTX 750 launched at $120 and now averages $35. The GeForce GTX 750 costs 94.2% less ($565 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.5 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 94.6 (GeForce GTX 750) — the GeForce GTX 750 offers 1620% better value. The GRID T4-1Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | GeForce GTX 750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1880 | $120-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $600 | $35-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.5 | 94.6+1620% |
| Codename | GM204 | GM107 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | February 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #525 | #559 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















