
GRID T4-1Q vs GRID P100-8Q

GRID T4-1Q
Popular choices:

GRID P100-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID T4-1Q is positioned at rank 304 and the GRID P100-8Q is on rank 384, so the GRID T4-1Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID T4-1Q
Performance Per Dollar GRID P100-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID T4-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P100-8Q.
| Insight | GRID T4-1Q | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID P100-8Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID P100-8Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $550 (vs $600), it costs 8% less, resulting in a 7.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID T4-1Q | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+7.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600) | ✅More affordable ($550) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID T4-1Q and GRID P100-8Q

GRID T4-1Q
The GRID T4-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,303 points.

GRID P100-8Q
The GRID P100-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,267 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID T4-1Q scores 3,303 and the GRID P100-8Q reaches 3,267 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID T4-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GRID P100-8Q uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 640 (GRID P100-8Q). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID T4-1Q) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID P100-8Q). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,303+1% | 3,267 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+220% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+189% | 1.672 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1306 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+220% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+140% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID T4-1Q draws 225W versus the GRID P100-8Q's 225W — a 0% difference. The GRID P100-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID T4-1Q) vs 350W (GRID P100-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 14.7+1% | 14.5 |
Value Analysis
The GRID T4-1Q launched at $1880 MSRP and currently averages $600, while the GRID P100-8Q launched at $7374 and now averages $550. The GRID P100-8Q costs 8.3% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.5 (GRID T4-1Q) vs 5.9 (GRID P100-8Q) — the GRID P100-8Q offers 7.3% better value. The GRID P100-8Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID T4-1Q | GRID P100-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1880-75% | $7374 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $600 | $550-8% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.5 | 5.9+7% |
| Codename | GM204 | GM107 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #525 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















