
Intel Arc Pro A60 vs GeForce RTX 4060

Intel Arc Pro A60
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is positioned at rank #60 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro A60
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 105.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro A60.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-105.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+105.9%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $299 versus $380 for the Intel Arc Pro A60, it costs 21% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 161.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+161.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($299) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro A60 and GeForce RTX 4060

Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.

GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 9,493 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 105.9%. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 2460 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 24 (GeForce RTX 4060) with 256 Tensor cores vs 96.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,493 | 19,548+106% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3072+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.397 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+80% |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz | 2460 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 128+33% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB | 24 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 24+50% |
| Tensor Cores | 256+167% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Intel Arc Pro A60 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Arc Pro A60 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 272 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB | 24 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: Intel Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro A60 draws 130W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 12.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 115W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 73°C-3% |
| Perf/Watt | 73.0 | 170.0+133% |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro A60 launched at $380 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 and now averages $299. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 21.3% less ($81 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 161.6% better value.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A60 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $380 | $299-21% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $299-21% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.0 | 65.4+162% |
| Codename | DG2-256 | AD107 |
| Release | June 6 2023 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #275 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















