Intel Arc Pro B60 vs GeForce RTX 4070
Intel Arc Pro B60
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro B60
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 95% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro B60.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro B60 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-95%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+95%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $550 (vs $450), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 59.5% better value per dollar than the Intel Arc Pro B60.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro B60 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+59.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($450) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro B60 and GeForce RTX 4070
Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 13,807 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 95%. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is built on Xe2 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 184.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,807 | 26,919+95% |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 5888+130% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+137% |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2475 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 160 | 184+15% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 46+130% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Intel Arc Pro B60 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel Arc Pro B60 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B60 draws 200W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 0% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 82 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 304mm |
| Height | 112mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 82 | 80°C-2% |
| Perf/Watt | 69.0 | 134.6+95% |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro B60 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 and now averages $550. The Intel Arc Pro B60 costs 18.2% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.7 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 59.3% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-17% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450-18% | $550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.7 | 48.9+59% |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | AD104 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #175 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Arc Pro B60 and GeForce RTX 4070
