Intel Arc Pro B60 vs Arc B570
Intel Arc Pro B60
Popular choices:
Arc B570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro B60
Performance Per Dollar Arc B570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc B570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro B60.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (249mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc B570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $219 versus $450 for the Intel Arc Pro B60, it costs 51% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 109.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+109.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) | ✅More affordable ($219) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro B60 and Arc B570
Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.
Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 13,807 and the Arc B570 reaches 14,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is built on Xe2 while the Arc B570 uses Xe2, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 2,304 (Arc B570). Raw compute: 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2500 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 18 (Arc B570) vs 144.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,807 | 14,060+2% |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.29 TFLOPS+7% | 11.52 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2500 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 16 | 80+400% |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 18 MB+350% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20+11% | 18 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 18 MB (Arc B570) — the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 160-bit+25% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 18 MB+350% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc B570). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs Intel Xe Media (Arc B570). Decoder: Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) vs Intel Xe Media. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | Intel Xe Media |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) | Intel Xe Media |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro B60 draws 200W versus the Arc B570's 150W — a 28.6% difference. The Arc B570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 600W (Arc B570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 249mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 150W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 249mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82 | 75°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 69.0 | 93.7+36% |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro B60 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the Arc B570 launched at $219 and now averages $219. The Arc B570 costs 51.3% less ($231 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.7 (Intel Arc Pro B60) vs 64.2 (Arc B570) — the Arc B570 offers 109.1% better value.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro B60 | Arc B570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $219-56% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450 | $219-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.7 | 64.2+109% |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | September 5 2025 | January 16 2025 |
| Ranking | #175 | #169 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Arc Pro B60 and Arc B570
