Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs GeForce GTX 560 SE
Iris Plus Graphics 950
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 560 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 560 SE is significantly newer (2012 vs 0). The GeForce GTX 560 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics 950.
| Insight | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.2%) |
| Longevity | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 560 SE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 950 and GeForce GTX 560 SE
Iris Plus Graphics 950
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
GeForce GTX 560 SE
The GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,847 points. Launch price was $89.99.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 scores 1,789 and the GeForce GTX 560 SE reaches 1,847 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is built on Generation 11.0 while the GeForce GTX 560 SE uses Fermi 2.0, both on 10 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 288 (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 SE).
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,789 | 1,847+3% |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+78% | 288 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS+21% | 0.8479 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 24+200% |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 SE has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 560 SE offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 12_0 (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Decoder: Quick Sync 7 vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync 7 | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | Quick Sync 7 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 560 SE's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-90% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 210mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 119.3+870% | 12.3 |
Value Analysis
The Iris Plus Graphics 950 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 560 SE launched at $150 and now averages $150. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 costs 100+% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 12.3 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) — the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Iris Plus Graphics 950 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 12.3 |
| Codename | Ice Lake GT2 | GF114 |
| Release | sem dados | February 20 2012 |
| Ranking | #634 | #706 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Iris Plus Graphics 950 and GeForce GTX 560 SE
