Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs UHD Graphics P630

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics P630

#253

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

587%

#255

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

533%

#256

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

531%

#260

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

483%

#261

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

480%

#263

Intel UHD Graphics P630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

100%

#264

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

MSRP: $300|Avg: $75

99%

#265

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

99%

#270

GeForce GTX 960A

MSRP: $199|Avg: $60

94%

#271

Radeon HD 8770

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

94%

#273

Radeon R9 M295X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $150

93%

#274

GeForce GT 325M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20

92%

#275

GeForce GTS 160M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

92%

#276

GeForce GTX 470M SLI

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

92%

#277

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200G

MSRP: $99|Avg: $70

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is significantly newer (2018 vs 0). The Intel UHD Graphics P630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics 950.

Insight	Iris Plus Graphics 950	Intel UHD Graphics P630
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%)
Longevity	Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics P630 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Iris Plus Graphics 950 Benchmark Check

Intel UHD Graphics P630 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Plus Graphics 950 and Intel UHD Graphics P630

Iris Plus Graphics 950

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

Intel UHD Graphics P630

The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 24 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,848 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 scores 1,789 and the Intel UHD Graphics P630 reaches 1,848 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is built on Generation 11.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 10 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 0.4608 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 950	Intel UHD Graphics P630
G3D Mark Score	1,789	1,848+3%
Architecture	Generation 11.0	Generation 9.5
Process Node	10 nm	14 nm+++
Shading Units	512+167%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.024 TFLOPS+122%	0.4608 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1000 MHz	1200 MHz+20%
ROPs	8+167%	3
TMUs	32+33%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 950	Intel UHD Graphics P630
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 950	Intel UHD Graphics P630
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	System
Bus Width	System	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 950	Intel UHD Graphics P630
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Decoder: Quick Sync 7 vs Gen 9.5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 (Intel UHD Graphics P630).

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 950	Intel UHD Graphics P630
Encoder	Quick Sync 7	Quick Sync (Coffee Lake)
Decoder	Quick Sync 7	Gen 9.5
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2	H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 draws 15W versus the Intel UHD Graphics P630's 15W — a 0% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 950	Intel UHD Graphics P630
TDP	15W	15W
Recommended PSU	1W	1W
Power Connector	Integrated	Integrated
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	119.3	123.2+3%

💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) vs 37.0 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) — the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers Infinity% better value.

Feature	Iris Plus Graphics 950	Intel UHD Graphics P630
MSRP	$0-100%	$100
Avg Price (30d)	$0-100%	$50
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	37.0
Codename	Ice Lake GT2	Coffee Lake GT2
Release	sem dados	May 24 2018
Ranking	#634	#640